Opuscula Math. 36, no. 2 (2016), 145-152
Bounds on the inverse signed total domination numbers in graphs
M. Atapour
S. Norouzian
S. M. Sheikholeslami
L. Volkmann
Abstract.
Let \(G=(V,E)\) be a simple graph. A function \(f:V\rightarrow \{-1,1\}\) is called an inverse signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at most zero. The inverse signed total domination number of \(G\), denoted by \(\gamma_{st}^0(G)\), equals to the maximum weight of an inverse signed total dominating function of \(G\). In this paper, we establish upper bounds on the inverse signed total domination number of graphs in terms of their order, size and maximum and minimum degrees.
Keywords:
inverse signed total dominating function, inverse signed total domination number.
Mathematics Subject Classification:
05C69.
References ▼
- [1] M.A. Henning, Signed total domination in graphs, Discrete Math. 278 (2004), 109-125.
- [2] Z. Huang, Z. Feng, H. Xing, Inverse signed total domination numbers of some kinds of graphs, Information Computing and Applications Communications in Computer and Information Science ICICA 2012, Part II, CCIS 308, 315-321, 2012.
- [3] D.B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 2000.
- [4] B. Zelinka, Signed total domination number of a graph, Czechoslovak Math. J. 51 (2001), 225-229.
About the authors ▼
M. Atapour
Department of Mathematics, University of Bonab, Bonab, I. R. Iran
S. Norouzian
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz, I. R. Iran
S. M. Sheikholeslami
Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University, Department of Mathematics, Tabriz, I. R. Iran
L. Volkmann
RWTH-Aachen University, Lehrstuhl II für Mathematik, 52056 Aachen, Germany
About the article ▼
Communicated by Mariusz Meszka.
Received: 2014-10-22.
Accepted: 2015-07-09.
Published online: 2015-12-18.
Cite this article as ▼
M. Atapour, S. Norouzian, S. M. Sheikholeslami, L. Volkmann, Bounds on the inverse signed total domination numbers in graphs, Opuscula Math. 36, no. 2 (2016), 145-152,
http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/OpMath.2016.36.2.145.
Download this article's citation as: